Manhattan Township Halts Electric Aggregation Program, Citing Poor Pricing
Residents in unincorporated Manhattan Township will no longer be enrolled in a group electricity purchasing plan after the Township Board voted unanimously not to renew its electric aggregation contract.
The decision was made during the board’s April 8 meeting after a review of new pricing proposals. According to Supervisor James ‘Jim’ Walsh, “This year’s proposed pricing does not seem as economical as it was in the last couple of years,” making the program less beneficial for residents.
Under the previous aggregation agreement, residents were automatically enrolled in the plan negotiated by the township unless they individually chose to opt out and select their own electricity supplier. By voting not to renew, the board has effectively ended the program for the time being. Residents will revert to the default ComEd supply rate or must independently choose an alternative retail electric supplier.
The motion to not renew the agreement was made by Trustee William ‘Bill’ McGrath and seconded by Trustee Mark Yunker. With the deadline to enter a new contract looming on April 15, the board’s vote provides a decisive end to the program.
Latest News Stories
Illinois lawmaker welcomes possible Marine deployment after Supreme Court ruling
Lincoln-Way Officials Warn of $400,000 State Funding Shortfall
County Board Approves Women’s Residential Treatment Center in Joliet
Library Board Reallocates Maturing CD and Debt Certificate Funds
White business owners are biggest share of Illinois’ diversity-preferred contract group
Filings delayed in convicted ex-Illinois House speaker’s appeal
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Manhattan Fire Protection District for Nov. 17, 2025
Jackson Township Approves America 250 Resolution and Dial-A-Ride Agreement
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for December 18, 2025
2025 illegal entries in Texas: Nearly half the gotaways reported in previous years
Nashville speaker maker plans to move overseas to avoid tariffs
Supreme Court could redefine 14th Amendment application