Construction Manager Decision Delayed for New Fire Station Project
The Manhattan Fire Protection District has postponed a decision on hiring a construction management company for its new fire station project while fee structures are finalized.
Board members met with several potential construction managers to oversee the project, reviewing fees and discussing general conditions for the work. Attorney John Motylinski told the board that using a construction manager is common practice and has worked well for other fire departments.
“When this project goes out to bid, using a construction manager could result in savings overall,” according to the meeting minutes. Construction managers are bonded and insured, providing additional protection for the project.
The board tabled the decision until fee structures are determined. The delay does not affect the project timeline, as construction documents are nearing completion and the district still expects to open bids in mid-April.
Chief Malone reported that outdoor lighting and landscaping plans for the new station have been completed, and the final draft of all construction documents should be available soon. The district continues to meet weekly with engineers and architects to advance the project toward the planned June or July groundbreaking.
The new station represents a significant expansion of the district’s capabilities following the Manhattan-Peotone consolidation.
Latest News Stories
L.A. congresswoman insists on health insurance tax credits
Newsom threatens university funding over Trump’s education deal
Former Los Angeles schools chief runs against city’s mayor
Illinois quick hits: WARN report layoffs total 1,689; Powerball winners in Rochelle and Colona
No ethics reform in sight as ex-speaker’s scheduled prison term begins
Trump losing ground on economy, poll finds
Major tech company to cut H-1B visas amid Trump pressure, fee
US, India to hold new round of trade talks, with focus on energy
Johnson: Republicans ‘have plans’ to ‘fix’ Obamacare
Illinois House Speaker: ‘Mr. Trump, tear down this fence!’
Energy cost concerns loom as legislators look at policy changes
PJM exit: A price solution or power move?