Frankfort Approves $1.3 Million in Bills, Including Annual Insurance Payment
The Frankfort Village Board authorized over $1.3 million in payments at its meeting Monday, with nearly half of the total amount covering the village’s annual insurance premiums.
Trustees unanimously approved the schedule of bills totaling $1,308,224.37. Trustee Adam Borrelli explained the composition of the substantial figure, highlighting the largest single expenditure.
“About half of that is our payment to SWARM, which is our basically our insurance payment for general liability, property, and workman’s comp,” Borrelli said. “And that total is $645,490, and again that payment is for the entire year.”
The remainder of the approved bills covered operational costs across several village funds. According to the meeting’s financial documents, disbursements included $784,236.59 from the General Corporate Fund, $236,909.37 from the Capital Development Fund, $238,533.06 for Sewer and Water Operations and Maintenance, and $48,545.35 from the Sewer and Water Extension Fund.
The approval of the bills was part of the board’s unanimous consent agenda, which includes routine items that are passed in a single vote without separate discussion.
Latest News Stories
Will County Committee Approves Rezoning, Denies Landfill Permit for Former Joliet Beach Club Site
FAA returns to normal operations after shutdown, launches probe
Illinois truckers back federal pause on non-domiciled CDLs, hope state follows suit
WATCH: DCFS updates missing children numbers; Budget cuts EO transparency criticized
Supreme Court declines to hear public prayer case
Supreme Court to decide immigration asylum case
Illinois quick hits: Armed robbery charges after incident at Senate President’s office
Michigan school board passes controversial sex ed policies
Everyday Economics: Jobs data returns as government reopens
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Land Use & Development Committee for November 6, 2025
Committee Rejects Rezoning for Fencing Company in Joliet Township
Supreme Court case could have major effect on 2026 midterms