‘Exactly what we need’: First expedited coal lease advances
The first expedited coal lease under the Big Beautiful Bill has advanced with the goal of energy independence and job creation in mind. An energy advocacy group says the move is “exactly what we need.”
Larry Behrens of Power the Future told The Center Square that “for generations, coal has answered the call when we need it and that’s why this order is both symbolic and practical.”
Power the Future is a nonprofit dedicated to the Americans working in reliable energy sources, according to its website.
Behrens told The Center Square that “when American energy demand set a new record less than two weeks ago, coal was the second-largest energy source used to keep the lights on and the ACs running.”
“Chinese-made wind and solar have received billions in subsidies but can’t deliver when it’s needed most,” Behrens said.
“The first expedited coal lease under the One Big Beautiful Bill aims to secure reliable energy that is ‘Made in the USA’ and that’s exactly what we need,” Behrens said.
The Department of the Interior announced in a news release that it “completed the environmental review for a major Utah coal project, marking the first expedited coal leasing action under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”
“By moving forward with responsible coal leasing, the Department of the Interior is strengthening domestic supply chains, supporting American workers and ensuring that rural communities benefit directly from the energy resources on public lands,” the release said.
Additionally, the release said that the “project delivers on President Trump’s agenda for energy independence and job creation.”
When reached, the Department of the Interior told The Center Square: “We put our official statement in our press releases. We don’t have anything additional to add.”
Acting Assistant Secretary for Lands and Minerals Management Adam Suess said in the release: “This is a critical step in unleashing the full economic potential of our coal resources and delivering reliable, affordable energy to American families.”
“President Trump made it clear that we will not tie up American energy in red tape,” Suess said. “Under his leadership, we’re cutting delays, boosting production, and putting miners back to work.”
The release said that the proceeding of coal leasing is in line with Trump’s executive order “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry,” as well as “advances the Trump administration’s priority to increase domestic energy production and restore American energy independence.”
The department’s move is “through the Bureau of Land Management and in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.”
The Bureau of Land Management will “soon open a public comment period on the fair market value and maximum economic recovery of the federal coal contained in the proposed lease area,” according to the release.
The Department of the Interior has made other changes in favor of American energy dominance recently, such as ending preferential treatment for “unreliable” wind and solar power, promoting the production of fossil fuels, and expanding coal mining, as The Center Square previously reported.
Latest News Stories
Illini Final Four trip expected to benefit University of Illinois, state of Indiana
Trump makes history at Supreme Court amid landmark birthright citizenship challenge
New Hampshire school district sued over transgender policies
Trump watches as high court hears challenge to his birthright citizenship order
Illinois Quick Hits: Prtizker says Trump order is unconstitutional
U of I pressed on costly abandoned development project, stance on DEI directives
Trump says Iran’s new leader wants ceasefire
‘Conversion therapy’ bans in IL, other states, in danger, after SCOTUS ruling
Lincoln-Way 210 Approves Student Registration and Meal Fee Increases for 2026-2027
County Board Approves Peotone Solar Farm Amid Debates Over Union Labor and Tornado Safety
Lincoln-Way West Offense Explodes in 12-2 Victory Over Revere
Illinois business leaders press lawmakers as child care costs face scrutiny