Supreme Court rejects bid to overturn H-1B visa rule
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a case challenging a rule that allows spouses of H-1B workers to work in the United States.
In the case, Save Jobs USA challenged a 2015 rule allowing spouses of H-1B workers to get H-4 visas. The rule was put in place by the Obama administration.
“Its definition contains no indication of work authorization, and for forty-five years the executive interpreted it as not permitting work,” a petition to the court reads.
The H-1B program allows businesses to petition for high-skilled foreign workers, typically with at least a bachelor’s degree, to work and live in the United States.
The visa is most often used by companies in the technology industry. In fiscal year 2025, Amazon, Meta and Apple were among the top petitioners for H-1B visas, according to data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website.
The high court’s denial to hear arguments in the case comes as President Donald Trump imposed a $100,000 fee on businesses that apply for new H-1B workers. The fee has already been challenged by a group of several unions.
The Department of Homeland Security granted more than 25,000 H-4 visa petitions to spouses of H-1B workers in fiscal year 2024, according to department data.
The District of Columbia circuit court previously rejected Save Jobs USA’s petition to change the rule allowing spouses to work in the country.
“Since announcing its claim of having unlimited authority to permit alien employment, DHS has promulgated regulations authorizing several massive alien employment programs entirely through regulation,” Save Jobs USA’s petition reads.
The petition pointed to the optional practical training program, which allows immigrant students to remain in the country after graduating from a U.S. college or university and before obtaining work authorization through the H-1B program.
“As long as aliens can work in the United States, they can afford to remain in the United States,” the petition reads. “This regulatory transformation of parole has subjected small communities to a huge influx of aliens that the communities have to support with increases in services.”
Latest News Stories
Hundreds of Uber drivers demand union-permitting bill move in Springfield
Summons issued to ISP, AG Cook County in FOID challenge
Pritzker knocks state progressives’ ability to pass new tax measures
Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker talks Bears stadium with NFL commissioner
Election 2026: Whatley gets another breath of Trump tailwind
Op-Ed: Oversight faps in federal drug program put Illinois’ independent practices at risk
Costco suit highlights gaps in $166B tariff refund process
Support swells across the aisle for $580B BUILD America 250 Act
Revised bipartisan housing bill passes U.S. House, one step closer to becoming law
War of words reignites with Trump, Pritzker, Bailey
Nesbitt asks DOJ to investigate Whitmer’s ties to grant scandal
Senate Republicans’ rebellion in War Powers Resolution vote could sway House vote