Manhattan Park Board Tables Decision on Site Plan for Potential Development

Manhattan Park Board Meeting | September 2025

Article Summary: The Manhattan Park Board postponed a decision on a proposal from Arete Design Studio to create a concept site plan, citing concerns over cost-sharing and the lack of a firm commitment from a developer. The plan was intended to explore development possibilities on a site adjacent to the historic Round Barn.

Site Plan Proposal Key Points:

• The board tabled Resolution 25-8, which would have approved a fee proposal from Arete Design Studio, LTD.

• Commissioners expressed hesitation to fund the plan without a financial commitment from a potential developer.

• Executive Director Kelly will approach the developer to discuss the possibility of splitting the cost.

• The board will reconsider the proposal at its October meeting.

The Manhattan Park Board on Thursday, September 11, 2025, opted to delay a decision on commissioning an architectural concept site plan for a potential new development, choosing instead to explore cost-sharing options with a developer.

The board discussed but ultimately tabled Resolution 25-8, which would have authorized an agreement with Arete Design Studio, Ltd. The proposal was for a concept plan for a potential sports complex development on property near the Round Barn Farm.

According to meeting minutes, board members debated the pros and cons of moving forward. While some commissioners felt the plan would be beneficial for understanding what could be achieved on the site, others raised concerns about committing park district funds without a firm commitment from a developer.

A discussion ensued regarding who should be responsible for the cost of the conceptual plan—the park district, the developer, or a split between the two. The board concluded the discussion by directing Executive Director Kelly to contact the developer to see if they would be willing to share the cost.

The item was tabled for future consideration and is expected to be brought back for discussion at the board’s October meeting, pending the outcome of the director’s negotiations.