California asks court to end federalization of National Guard

California asks court to end federalization of National Guard

Spread the love

California officials Friday renewed their motion for a judge to end the federalized deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles.

Attorney General Rob Bonta and Gov. Gavin Newsom filed the motion for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The action seeks to return the federalized California National Guard troops to Newsom’s control. Bonta and Newsom say there’s no basis for the Aug. 5 order that extended the federalization of the National Guard.

Newsom is listed as the complaint’s plaintiff. President Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth are named as defendants.

“There have been soldiers deployed to the Los Angeles area for more than five months, with current orders for continued deployment at least until February 2026 (and subject to further extension),” according to the motion. “After using isolated incidents of violence in June as a pretext to federalize the California National Guard, Defendants have now implemented a months-long military occupation, without any justification, and with no apparent end in sight.

“Even if events in June justified the initial federalization and deployment of the military in Los Angeles, there is no lawful basis for keeping troops there now,” the 21-page motion continues. “The June violence has long since subsided. Yet still, troops remain in the Nation’s second-largest city.”

In a news release Friday, Bonta accused the Trump administration of extending the federalization of the National Guard without any justification.

“We’re asking the courts — again — to step in, because this isn’t politics, it’s a threat to our democracy and to the safety of the Americans we serve,” Newsom said.

The Center Square reached out Friday to the U.S. Department of Justice and Pentagon for comment, but did not get a response.

In Friday’s court motion, Bonta and Newsom accused the Trump administration of treating the president’s June 7 memorandum federalizing the National Guard “as a blank check” to federalize National Guard troops and send them anywhere in the U.S.

The motion later says, “Approximately 200 members of California’s National Guard are currently hundreds of miles away, in another State, hindering their capacity to respond to emergencies within California.” That’s a reference to 200 troops who were initially deployed in Los Angeles and are now in Oregon. Another 14 troops were originally sent from California to Oregon but are now stationed in Illinois.

The Trump administration initially deployed about 4,000 federalized California National Guard troops and 700 Marines in Los Angeles after protests against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests turned violent in June.

The motion said the Trump administration’s decision to move 214 troops to other states shows it knows there’s no need to federalize National Guard troops in California.

In September, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer ruled against Trump’s deployment of the California National Guard and Marines. Breyer, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, ruled the military could continue to guard federal facilities but could not be used for law enforcement. Breyer said the federal use of National Guard for crowd control and set up protective perimeters and traffic blockades violates the Posse Comitatus Act, the 1878 federal law that prohibits the use of the U.S. military to enforce domestic law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in September blocked Breyer’s stay of the deployment. But on Oct. 29, the same court ruled the U.S. District Court for Northern California has jurisdiction in the case.

The Posse Comitatus Act allows Congress to pass laws to use military in case of domestic unrest, protection of federal property and enforcement of some federal laws and court orders, according to an abstract on a 1987 Journal of Criminal Justice article. The U.S. Department of Justice published the abstract on its website, ojp.gov.

Newsom’s office has also argued about costs. It said Trump’s deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles is costing taxpayers nearly $120 million. The office said the figure was provided by the California National Guard at the governor’s request.

The Secretary of War’s Office told The Center Square in September that the Department of War would have no cost figures “until after the mission is completed.”

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Elite private colleges can’t cap off price-fixing collusion class action

Elite private colleges can’t cap off price-fixing collusion class action

By Scott Holland | Legal NewslineThe Center Square A federal judge in Chicago has refused to end an antitrust class action complaint accusing elite universities of colluding in the financial...
Illinois Quick Hits: GOP gubernatorial forum set for Monday

Illinois Quick Hits: GOP gubernatorial forum set for Monday

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – All four Republican gubernatorial candidates are scheduled to participate in a forum in East Dundee on Monday....
lincoln way school district 210 logo.2

Lincoln-Way Board Approves Girls Flag Football for 2026-2027 Season

Lincoln-Way 210 Board of Education Meeting | Jan. 15, 2026 Article Summary: The Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 Board of Education unanimously approved the addition of girls flag football...
WATCH: Ives investigates tax dollars for NGOs; Republicans say Pritzker raising energy prices

WATCH: Ives investigates tax dollars for NGOs; Republicans say Pritzker raising energy prices

By Greg Bishop | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – In today's edition of Illinois in Focus Daily, The Center Square's Greg Bishop talks live with Jeanne...
ICE hiring ban bill reignites SAFE-T Act fight at Illinois Capitol

ICE hiring ban bill reignites SAFE-T Act fight at Illinois Capitol

By Catrina Baker | The Center Square contributorThe Center Square (The Center Square) – A newly introduced bill that would bar former Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from working in...
Will County Board Graphic.02

Executive Committee Advances Dissolution of Southeast Joliet Sanitary District

Will County Board Executive Committee Meeting | January 8, 2026 Article Summary: The Executive Committee moved forward with two resolutions to facilitate the dissolution of the Southeast Joliet Sanitary District...
Will County Board Graphic.01

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Legislative Committee for January 6, 2026

Will County Board Legislative Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Legislative Committee met on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, to finalize the county’s state and...
Will County Logo Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Capital Improvements & IT Committee for January 6, 2026

Capital Improvements & IT Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Capital Improvements and IT Committee met on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, to discuss facility...
Will County Board Graphic.04

Public Works Committee: $18.8 Million Contract Awarded for Lorenzo Road Bridge Over BNSF Railway

Will County Public Works & Transportation Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Article Summary: A contract for nearly $18.9 million was confirmed for the construction of a new bridge carrying...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Public Health & Safety Committee for January 7, 2026

Will County Board Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting | January 7, 2026 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Public Health and Safety Committee met on Wednesday, January 7, 2026,...
Will County Board Graphic.03

Executive Committee: Relaxes Rules for Retiring Employee Proclamations

Will County Board Executive Committee Meeting | January 8, 2026 Article Summary: The Executive Committee voted to amend county board rules to allow proclamations honoring retiring county employees to pass...
Will County Board Graphic.02

Lobbyist Updates: State Session Resumes; Transit Safety Concerns Raised

Will County Board Legislative Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Article Summary: State lobbyists briefed the Will County Legislative Committee on the upcoming General Assembly session, noting a likely focus...
Will County Finance Logo

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Finance Committee for January 6, 2026

Will County Board Finance Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Finance Committee met on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, to handle a light agenda of routine...
Will County Board Graphic.04

Capital Imp Committee: Facilities Director Reports on VAC Progress and Critical Health Department Elevator Repairs

Capital Improvements & IT Committee Meeting | January 6, 2026 Article Summary:Facilities Director Bill Fern provided updates on major renovation projects, including the completion of the Court Annex and the...
Will County Board Graphic.01

‘Good Food For All’ Initiative Proposes Local Agricultural Asset Mapping for Will County

Will County Board Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting | January 7, 2026 Article Summary: Bob Heuer of HNA Networks presented a "Good Food For All" initiative to the Public...