Chicago council committee rejects mayor’s proposed tax hikes
(The Center Square) – The Chicago City Council Committee on Finance has rejected a package of higher taxes proposed by Mayor Brandon Johnson.
After the committee voted 25 to 10 against Johnson’s revenue package Monday afternoon, the mayor refused to back down from his proposed corporate head tax.
The mayor’s plan would impose a $21-per-worker monthly tax on businesses with 100 employees or more, although there have been discussions about some workers being exempted. A business with exactly 100 employees would pay $2,100 a month, or $25,200 annually.
Johnson said Chicago’s elevated number of downtown office vacancies are not a result of high taxes.
“The reason why, first of all, the vacancy exists is because, obviously, we’re still recovering from the pandemic. There is no correlation between taxation and the success, if you will, of corporations,” Johnson said.
Reed Smith partner David Dorner said a head tax is not the way to bring people into Chicago.
“I think it’s going to keep people out of the city when we want to bring them back in and have people working here, coming downtown, visiting the downtown businesses. You don’t want to give them a reason not to come to the office, and that’s what the head tax would do,” Dorner told The Center Square.
In addition to the corporate head tax, the mayor’s $16.6 billion spending plan includes new taxes on social media, sports betting and boat mooring.
Dorner said the mayor’s cloud tax, or lease tax, would affect the lease, rental or use of computer software or cloud infrastructure.
“As you can imagine, businesses today spend a lot of their budget on technology, including software as a service, and that’s going to be subject to this higher tax if it’s passed by the city of Chicago. It’s already at 11%. It wasn’t too long ago it was at 9%,” Dorner explained.
Dorner said increasing the tax to 15% would impact businesses and individuals who pay for software licenses.
The mayor was asked about opposition to the cloud tax from small business owners and aldermen.
“First of all, it doesn’t affect working people the way in which it’s being described. We’re talking about an industry that’s making more money than they even imagine,” Johnson said.
Johnson insisted that a corporate tax would stay in his budget and promised to veto any budget with a property tax increase. He also promised to veto any budget that included layoffs.
The city council’s budget committee cancelled its scheduled meeting Monday afternoon after the finance committee defeated Johnson’s tax package.
As of late Monday afternoon, the full council was still scheduled to meet Tuesday morning.
Latest News Stories
Lincoln-Way 210 to Launch District Literacy Plan, Expands Community Partnerships
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Manhattan School District 114 Board of Education for September 17, 2025
Jackson Township Refers Manure-to-Gas Plant Proposal to Planning Commission
County Board Abates Over $25 Million in Property Taxes for Bond Payments
School Board Approves ‘Board Book Premier’ for Paperless Meetings
Lincoln-Way 210 Prepares for “Retirement Wave” with Focus on Recruitment
District 114 to Overhaul Policy Updates with New ‘Press Plus’ Service
Lincoln-Way Board Weighs Community Solar Program Promising $155,000 in Annual Savings
Will County Reverses Zoning on Peotone Farmland to Facilitate 10-Acre Sale
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees for September 10, 2025
Manhattan Park Board Hires New Architect for Round Barn Buildout, Secures Annexation for Future Banquet Hall
Lincoln-Way 210 Board Approves $172.7 Million Budget with Planned Deficit for Bus Purchases
Manhattan School District 114 Approves $41.5 Million Budget for FY26
Manhattan Fire District Advances New Station with $8.75M Bond Hearing, Approves Contracts with $194,000 Savings