Wyoming’s year in review: Education savings, contentious spending
Wyoming lawmakers passed legislation to expand education savings accounts and property tax protections in 2025. However, the legislature remained divided on substantial spending increases to boost particular school capital construction projects.
The Club for Growth Foundation reviewed 875 floor votes in the Wyoming legislature, with a specific focus on 19 votes in the state House and 13 in the state Senate. The foundation scored lawmakers on their adherence to “pro-growth” policies, including deregulation and taxpayer friendliness.
The state’s legislature passed expanded education savings accounts in 2025. The expansion increased annual funding from $6,000 to $7,000 and provided for universal eligibility.
“The universal eligibility and expanded use provisions are marked improvements for the existing program,” the Club for Growth wrote. The Wyoming House passed the bill, 42-19, sending it to the Senate for a 21-8 passage.
Wyoming Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-04, voted for the bill whereas Sen. Stephan Pappas, R-07, voted against the legislation. Sens. Evie Brennan, R-31, and Mike Gierau, D-17, supported the legislation until its eventual passage.
The state’s legislature attempted to make significant strides in adding property tax protections. A bill passed by the Wyoming House would have created a 50% personal property tax exemption up to the first $1 million that would be prevalent over the next two years. The legislation would have made available a $100 million stabilization fund.
The Club for Growth estimated that the legislation would provide almost $400 million in personal property tax relief through fiscal year 2027. Reps. Trey Sherwood, D-14, and Martha Lawley, R-27, voted against the legislation.
Ultimately, though, the Wyoming House passed the property tax exemption in a 40-20. However, the Senate never took up the measure.
The legislature appeared to struggle with competing visions in 2025 as it attempted to pass legislation that would increase funding for several school capital construction projects by more than $206 million. The legislation was a 67% increase over existing funding levels and was rejected by the Wyoming House in a 30-30 vote.
The proposed legislation’s divide was not merely on political lines. Reps. Steve Harshman, R-37, and Karlee Provenza, D-45, voted for the legislation’s increased funding; whereas Rep. Scott Heiner approved the legislation’s funding for a select few school capital projects.
“To best position Wyoming for sustained future success, bloated budgets and excess spending must be quelled in future legislative sessions,” McIntosh said.
Big budget spending has been increasingly relevant in states across the country over the past several years, McIntosh said. Legislators are developing initiatives to increase spending baselines without taxpayer considerations.
“The money isn’t free and once the federal spigot turns off, states must maintain those new programs, which means spending baselines become structurally and permanently elevated,” McIntosh said.
Latest News Stories
U.S. Supreme Court could rule on Texas lawsuits brought in Democratic-led state courts
WATCH: Illinois In Focus Daily | Monday Aug. 11th, 2025
Illinois quick hits: Judge denies Madigan’s motion; legislator urges action on DCFS interns
About Us
Everyday Economics: CPI takes center stage as tariff-driven price pressures mount
Net negative migration is harmful to the economy, economists say
Details pending on billions in foreign investments coming from trade deals
Will County Health Department Seeks $1 Million to Avert ‘Drastic’ Service Cuts from Expiring Grants
Will County’s “First-in-Nation” Veterans Center to House Workforce Services, Sparking Debate
Improved Vendor Service Creates $1.2 Million Shortfall in Sheriff’s Medical Budget
Will County Public Works Committee Unveils 25-Year Transportation Plan, Projects $258 Million Gap
Will County Animal Protection Services Seeks New Facility Amid “Gaping Wound” of Space Crisis
Board Confronts Animal Services Crowding, Explores Future Facility Options
Will County Board Members Demand Transparency in Cannabis Tax Fund Allocation