DHS funding bill teeters as Democrats balk over ICE concerns
Congress is racing to advance the last four federal spending bills through the House Rules Committee in time for a floor vote Thursday.
But Democratic opposition to the bill funding Homeland Security for fiscal year 2026 is threatening to stall progress, even as the Jan. 30 government funding deadline looms.
“Without real reforms and accountability, I will not vote to give the Department of Homeland Security another cent,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., posted Wednesday only hours before the committee markup. “Judicial warrants for arrests. Prosecution of officers who violate our constitutional rights. Cooperation with local law enforcement investigations. No more masks.”
Of the 12 annual appropriations bills, three are law, three await the president’s signature, and two more have passed the House.
The remaining four, released Tuesday, fund Defense; Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education; Transportation and Housing and Urban Development; and Homeland Security.
Jayapal, along with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and other prominent House Democrats, believe the $64 billion Homeland Security bill fails to effectively curb Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
The debate over whether ICE agents have overstepped their authority reignited after an ICE agent fatally shot a Minnesota woman, who was allegedly trying to run over law enforcement officers with her vehicle.
The Homeland Security appropriations bill keeps funding levels for ICE at $10 billion. It also funds Customs and Border Patrol, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), disaster response agencies and other bipartisan initiatives.
Even though $20 million is set aside to purchase body cameras for federal immigration officers, House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., told reporters Wednesday that members “overwhelmingly” believe the modest accountability measures “aren’t enough.”
“There aren’t enough guardrails within this bill. I can still appreciate the work that went into the bill while mentioning that commonsense reforms that Democrats put up as amendments and alternatives were roundly rejected,” Aguilar said. “It’s unfortunate that the behavior of ICE is jeopardizing the Homeland Security bill.”
Aguilar added that he will vote no on the bill unless “substantive changes or amendments in the Rules committee.”
Due to the controversy, the committee has made Homeland Security a stand-alone bill, while packaging the remaining three into a minibus.
Latest News Stories
Plan would have state taxpayers provide $50M for ICE-impacted businesses
Plan would have state taxpayers provide $50M for ICE-impacted businesses
Midwest takes brunt of rising gas prices
Manhattan District 114 Rejects Bus Bids, Retains Lincoln-Way with Six-Month Trial
JJC Entrepreneur and Business Center Celebrates $800,000 Federal Grant, Client Successes
Chicago mayor to push for local funding, keeping Bears
Senate Republicans unveil $72 billion budget package to fund ICE, CBP
Jackson Township Reassesses Land Acquisition Needs for ComEd Project
Illinois AI regulations have mild industry support, could draw federal ire
DOJ files complaint to block Minnesota climate lawsuit
Hegseth: Ceasefire holds despite Iranian aggression
Illinois Quick Hits: Mayors to visit capitol urge protection of local funding