Fire District Establishes Fees for Lift Assists
Manhattan Fire Protection District Meeting | Dec. 15, 2025
Article Summary: The board approved a new ordinance establishing fees for “excessive” lift assists, though officials noted the policy is primarily for future use.
Lift Assist Fees Key Points:
-
Ordinance 2025-08 establishes “reasonable rates” for lift assists.
-
The policy targets “excessive” lift assists rather than routine calls.
-
Attorney John Motylinski advised the board to put the policy in place now, even if it is not immediately utilized.
The Manhattan Fire Protection District Board of Trustees on Monday, Dec. 15, approved a new ordinance allowing the district to charge fees for lift assist calls.
Ordinance 2025-08 establishes “reasonable fees for excessive lift assists,” according to the meeting minutes. The State of Illinois permits fire departments to charge for such services.
During the discussion, it was noted that the ordinance “most likely will not effect us now, but could be used in the future.” District Attorney John Motylinski reviewed the ordinance and explained to the trustees that it was a good idea to put the framework in place now.
Trustee Nick Kotchou made the motion to approve the ordinance, seconded by Trustee Mike Shivers. The motion passed unanimously.
Latest News Stories
Law firm: California’s gender policies violate Constitution
Group challenges gender policies in New Mexico schools
Supreme Court rules for Texas in Rio Grande River lawsuit
Trump appoints housing regulator as acting spy chief
Mullin defends $118B Homeland Security budget request
Bill loosens in-state tuition requirements
Illinois Quick Hits: Nine arrested during Naperville teen gathering
Rubio provides few answers to Congress on Iran conflict timeline
Pritzker housing proposal partly stalls amid overreach concerns from localities
HUD shifts $4B homelessness program from ‘Housing First’ to treatment
Poll: Democrats hold slight edge over Rogers in Michigan U.S. Senate race
Swipe fee battle continues after delay, court ruling