Graham blocks govt. funding vote over policy demands as deadline looms
With only hours before the federal government runs out of money, tensions are rising in the U.S. Senate as a handful of Republicans block a vote on federal funding bills over policy demands.
Supported by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has placed a hold on the vote to advance the remaining funding legislation for fiscal year 2026.
As of Friday afternoon, Graham refused to lift the hold unless he was guaranteed a vote in the near future on legislation prohibiting sanctuary cities.
He also demanded a vote on an amendment to the Homeland Security bill that would prohibit the federal government in most circumstances from collecting Americans’ metadata without their knowledge, as well as allow both senators and private individuals to sue the federal government if it does so.
“I’m asking for two simple things: give me a chance to express myself on what the solution to our problems of immigration are – I’m not asking for an outcome, [just] for a vote,” Graham told lawmakers Friday. “And as to Arctic Frost, I want to have a chance to have a vote on a version that would expand private cause of actions for non-members of Congress who may have a claim against Jack Smith.”
Some of Graham’s colleagues have rebuked his actions, with Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., urging him not to shut down the government “to make a point.”
“The reason why we’re not moving forward today doesn’t have anything to do with the Democrats. It has to do with a handful of Republicans who are refusing to let us move forward,” Tillis said. “We’re going to shut down the government because some Republicans refuse to take the win, refuse to take a negotiated agreement that the president agrees with.”
Senate leaders from both parties struck a funding deal Thursday – which President Donald Trump supported – and had planned to vote that evening.
Under the agreement, the Senate split off the Homeland Security funding bill from the six-bill appropriations package and planned to pass the remaining five, sending them to Trump’s desk.
Lawmakers would then redraft the Homeland Security bill to include Democrats’ demands — bans on mask-wearing and roving patrols, body-worn camera requirements, and warrant rule changes, among other things.
But since restructuring and passing that bill could take weeks, senators will also pass a short-term Continuing Resolution to keep Homeland Security funding on cruise control in the meantime.
The House must approve the CR, however, and it will not return until after Jan. 30, meaning funding for some agencies covered under the Homeland Security bill will lapse.
While a weekend-long partial shutdown would have little negative impact, many Republican congressmen have expressed opposition to severing the House-passed Homeland Security bill and tailoring it to Democrats’ wishes.
“[Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer’s current demands, compounded by a lack of Conservative priorities, are an absolute non-starter,” Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., said.
Latest News Stories
WATCH: Commission makes ICE accountability referral; Rep says Pritzker wrong on prices
Illinois quick hits: DOJ sues over voters lists; CTA security surge
Trump administration pauses visa program after Brown U shooting suspect found dead
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Committee of the Whole for Dec. 2025
JJC Board Approves 2025 Tax Levy and Bond Abatement
BREAKING: Milwaukee judge guilty of felony obstruction during ICE arrest
GOP opposes California tuition aid for Illegal Immigrants
Texas reps launch new Sharia Caucus
Legislator demands DCFS set record straight on child welfare interns
Illinois energy costs expected to increase as Pritzker considers bill
Plaintiff in redistricting lawsuit predicts Supreme Court fight
Texas leaders propose solution for northern border, national security