Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Debt confidence hits two-year low amid affordability concerns
Candidates debate healthcare for Nevada primary
ExxonMobil shareholders approve plan to redomicile to Texas
U.S., Iran may be on the cusp of tentative ceasefire extension
Pritzker indicates he’ll sign new insurance regulations
Election 2026: For one of the four seats, trouble brews
Treasury reveals how to sign up for Trump Accounts on new app
Republicans claim fake transparency in early budget, demand better
Ceasefire in question as U.S. accuses Iran of violations
Supreme Court rules against prison sentence reductions
Illinois may take DOJ ‘Anti-Weaponization’ payouts from residents
Supreme Court rules in favor of racially biased jury claims