Will County Board Graphic.04

Will County Board Advised on Strict “Judicial” Role Ahead of Landfill Expansion Application

Spread the love

Will County Landfill Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026

Article Summary: During a detailed legal briefing on Tuesday, the Will County Landfill Committee received strict instructions regarding their conduct during the upcoming application process for a landfill expansion. Special Assistant State’s Attorney Charles Helsten warned officials that they must act as impartial judges and avoid private communications with the public or county staff to preserve the legal integrity of the siting process.

Landfill Siting Process Key Points:

  • Quasi-Judicial Role: Board members act as judges, not legislators, and cannot discuss the application privately (ex parte) once filed.

  • The “Ethical Wall”: A legal separation will be established between the County Board (the decision-makers) and the County Executive/Staff (the applicants).

  • Timeline: Once the application is filed, a public hearing must occur between 90 and 120 days later, with a final vote required within 180 days.

  • New Accessibility Laws: Recent state statute amendments require the county to provide interpretation services for non-English speakers and accommodations for disabilities to ensure “meaningful access.”

The Will County Landfill Committee on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, received a stern legal briefing regarding their responsibilities during the anticipated expansion of the county-owned Prairie View Landfill.

Charles Helsten, a Special Assistant to the Will County State’s Attorney, outlined the rigorous “quasi-judicial” process board members must adhere to, warning that the County Board will simultaneously serve as the applicant seeking the expansion and the judge approving it. To manage this conflict, Helsten described the implementation of an “ethical wall” to separate decision-makers from the county staff preparing the technical application.

“The author of a play or a novel cannot be the reviewing critic,” Helsten told the committee. “We will have one attorney that will represent the county in its executive capacity… There will be a separate attorney that represents you as the decision makers. And never the twain will meet.”

The briefing comes as the county prepares to file a siting application, a process governed by nine specific statutory criteria ranging from flood plain location to traffic impact and consistency with the county’s solid waste management plan.

Helsten emphasized that once the application is formally filed, board members are strictly prohibited from having “ex parte” communications—private discussions with the public or objectors regarding the proposal. He cited case law where election pamphlets promising a specific vote on a landfill were used as evidence of prejudgment, potentially jeopardizing the legality of the final decision.

“You sit as a judge,” Helsten said. “If you see Miss Williams and her attorney halfway through the trial going to lunch with the judge and then you lose, what are you going to think?”

The committee also reviewed the strict timeline mandated by state law. Once the application is filed, a 90-day review period begins. A public hearing must be held no sooner than 90 days and no later than 120 days after filing. The board must vote on the application within 180 days, or the project is deemed approved by default.

Helsten highlighted a new amendment to the state siting statute requiring “meaningful access” for the public. This includes mandatory interpreters for non-English speakers and accommodations for individuals with disabilities. Helsten noted this change was driven by a recent case in a Chicago suburb where a hearing was conducted entirely in English despite the local population being nearly 60% Latino.

“You bend over backwards to make sure that the process is fundamentally fair,” Helsten advised.

Board Member Kelly Hickey (D-Naperville) asked for clarification on how board members should respond to constituents asking about their voting intentions.

“At no point during the process should anyone say ‘this is how I intend to vote,'” Hickey asked.

Helsten confirmed that members should state they are keeping an open mind until all evidence is presented at the public hearing.

County Board Speaker Joe VanDuyne (D-Wilmington) noted that the board’s composition could change following elections and requested that the legal briefing be repeated for future members to ensure the process remains legally sound.

“We do want to do this correct,” VanDuyne said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

MFPD-Logo-Fire District

Former Peotone Firefighter Mike Shivers Recommended for Fire District Board Position

The Manhattan Fire Protection District board unanimously recommended Mike Shivers to fill a vacant trustee position left by the recent death of Trustee Bill Osborne. Shivers, a former Peotone Fire...
MFPD-Logo-Fire District

Fire District February 17 Meeting Briefs

New Commissioner Sworn In: Attorney John Motylinski administered the oath of office to Commissioner Anton "Tony" Brncich, who was appointed by the Board of Trustees in December. Brncich officially began...
Police Crime

Manhattan Police Reports

Disclaimer: Charges against each defendant are merely an accusation, with all defendants presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. On January 27, officers stopped Marshbanks, Turquoise E (42)...
Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township Bridge Project Saved After County Commissioner Intervenes with Forest Preserve

A critical bridge replacement project in Manhattan Township, jeopardized by a stalemate with the Will County Forest Preserve District and the potential loss of $500,000 in funding, has been saved...
Manhattan Township

Soltage Solar Farm Clears Township Hurdle with Detailed Landscaping Plan

A proposed solar farm by Soltage Renewable Energy has cleared a key local hurdle after its representative presented a detailed landscaping and aesthetics plan that satisfied the Manhattan Township Board....
Manhattan Township

Solar Developer Commits Up to $800,000 for Smith Road Improvements

Summit Ridge Energy, a solar farm developer, has committed to providing up to $800,000 for the engineering and construction of improvements along Smith Road, Manhattan Township officials announced Tuesday. The...
Manhattan Township

Meeting Briefs: Manhattan Township for February 11, 2025

Baker Road Bridge Work Imminent: Highway Commissioner Jim Baltas reported that the Road District crew will soon begin trimming trees to prepare for the upcoming construction on the Baker Road Bridge....
Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township to Review Solar Farm Proposal at Special Meeting

Manhattan Township will host a special meeting Jan. 28 to review a proposed solar farm development at the corner of Cherry Hill and Manhattan roads. Soltage Renewable Energy Provider has...
Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township Briefs

Township Approves $81,000 Assessor Budget: Manhattan Township trustees unanimously approved the 2025-2026 assessor's office budget request of $81,000 during their Jan. 14 meeting. The budget includes increases for employee salaries...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Property Values to Rise 13% in 2025 Assessment

Jackson Township property owners will see assessed values increase by 13.18% in the upcoming assessment cycle, Assessor LeGrett reported at the township's January 8 monthly meeting. The increase, which will...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Advances Infrastructure Projects Despite Winter Conditions

Jackson Township continues progress on major infrastructure improvements while maintaining winter road operations, officials reported at the January 8 township meeting. Supervisor Matt Robbins updated the board on the ongoing...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Meeting Briefs

Meeting Approvals: Jackson Township trustees unanimously approved December 2024 meeting minutes and the monthly financial statement during their January 8 meeting. The board also approved the assessor's 2025 budget as...
Police blue and red flashing light on the car in the street

Manhattan Police Reports

Disclaimer: Charges against each defendant are merely an accusation, with all defendants presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. On November 25, officers cited Parker, Kenneth R (53) of...
Blue flasher light of siren of police car

Manhattan Police Reports

Disclaimer: Charges against each defendant are merely an accusation, with all defendants presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. On November 17, officers cited Randle, Devante (24) of...