solar panels photovoltaics in solar farm

Will County Legislative Committee Unanimously Backs Resolution Demanding Return of Local Solar Siting Control

Spread the love

Will County Board Legislative Committee Meeting | April 7, 2026

Article Summary: The Will County Board Legislative Committee unanimously passed an amended resolution on Tuesday demanding the Illinois General Assembly repeal or amend state laws that stripped local governments of their authority to regulate the siting of commercial solar, wind, and battery energy facilities.

Resolution 26-4609 Key Points:

  • Resolution 26-4609 specifically targets 55 ILCS 5/5-12020 and Public Act 104-0458, which currently prevent counties from enacting restrictive zoning standards on commercial renewable energy developments.

  • The committee unanimously amended the original resolution text to explicitly include “battery energy facilities” alongside solar and wind, and added “townships” to the list of local entities protesting the loss of control.

  • State legislative lobbyists advised the committee that while the General Assembly is currently unwilling to return the authority, documenting specific “poor outcomes” in Will County is the best strategy to lobby for future changes.

The Will County Board Legislative Committee on Tuesday, April 7, 2026, launched a formal pushback against Springfield’s control over local renewable energy development, unanimously approving a resolution demanding the return of county zoning authority over commercial solar, wind, and battery facilities.

Resolution 26-4609, titled “Restoring Local Control to County Boards Related to Commercial Solar Facilities,” officially urges the Illinois General Assembly to repeal or amend provisions of 55 ILCS 5/5-12020 and Public Act 104-0458. The legislation, passed by the state to streamline green energy initiatives, effectively stripped county boards of their ability to heavily restrict or deny commercial renewable energy projects that meet standard statutory requirements.

Will County Board Speaker Joe VanDuyne introduced the resolution to the committee, emphasizing the frustration expressed by local municipalities, townships, and residents who feel powerless against massive solar developments encroaching on agricultural land.

“We consistently hear from residents. We consistently hear from the municipalities and also the townships on what they see in their future, and who better else to know and work with these local officials and ourselves to find out where the best locations are for these solar farms,” VanDuyne told the committee. “We want to be able to make decisions on behalf of our residents… We want our control back to where we can vote yes or no without the threat of litigation.”

During the discussion, County Board Member Judy Ogalla proposed amending the resolution to ensure it covered all facets of the state’s green energy legislation, not just solar panels.

“We need to include battery storage because battery storage is also included in their grand bill to just put them anywhere they wish as well,” Ogalla said. “I think you wouldn’t want a battery storage facility set up right next to a neighborhood.”

Ogalla also successfully motioned to amend the seventh paragraph of the resolution to explicitly include “townships” alongside local mayors and citizens as entities urging the county to reject inappropriate facilities. The committee unanimously approved the amendments to insert “battery energy facilities” and “townships” into the final text before advancing the entire resolution.

The county’s legislative lobbying firm, Mac Strategies, provided a sobering update on the likelihood of immediate state-level changes. Lobbyist Matt indicated that several state bills attempting to return permitting authority to local governments—including House Bill 1420, Senate Bill 3268, and Senate Bill 3450—have either stalled in committee or been granted extensions with no substantive action taken.

“The legislature took that authority, and they took it knowingly, and they have continued to be quite reluctant, frankly unwilling, to give any of it back,” the lobbyist stated. He advised that if the Will County Board hopes to claw back its zoning powers, it must meticulously document the negative impacts the state law is having on its communities. “The best way to do it is to offer up examples of poor outcomes that your county had to live through because you didn’t have the on-the-ground, most local opportunity to weigh in.”

If approved by the full Will County Board, certified copies of Resolution 26-4609 will be sent to Governor J.B. Pritzker, the President of the Illinois Senate, the Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives, and all members of the Illinois General Assembly representing Will County.

Manhattan Weather Full forecast →
Today Jun 3
Mostly Sunny
86° 65°

Mostly Sunny

💨 10 to 15 mph 💧 0%

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township Bridge Project Saved After County Commissioner Intervenes with Forest Preserve

A critical bridge replacement project in Manhattan Township, jeopardized by a stalemate with the Will County Forest Preserve District and the potential loss of $500,000 in funding, has been saved...
Manhattan Township

Soltage Solar Farm Clears Township Hurdle with Detailed Landscaping Plan

A proposed solar farm by Soltage Renewable Energy has cleared a key local hurdle after its representative presented a detailed landscaping and aesthetics plan that satisfied the Manhattan Township Board....
Manhattan Township

Solar Developer Commits Up to $800,000 for Smith Road Improvements

Summit Ridge Energy, a solar farm developer, has committed to providing up to $800,000 for the engineering and construction of improvements along Smith Road, Manhattan Township officials announced Tuesday. The...
Manhattan Township

Meeting Briefs: Manhattan Township for February 11, 2025

Baker Road Bridge Work Imminent: Highway Commissioner Jim Baltas reported that the Road District crew will soon begin trimming trees to prepare for the upcoming construction on the Baker Road Bridge....
Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township to Review Solar Farm Proposal at Special Meeting

Manhattan Township will host a special meeting Jan. 28 to review a proposed solar farm development at the corner of Cherry Hill and Manhattan roads. Soltage Renewable Energy Provider has...
Manhattan Township

Manhattan Township Briefs

Township Approves $81,000 Assessor Budget: Manhattan Township trustees unanimously approved the 2025-2026 assessor's office budget request of $81,000 during their Jan. 14 meeting. The budget includes increases for employee salaries...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Property Values to Rise 13% in 2025 Assessment

Jackson Township property owners will see assessed values increase by 13.18% in the upcoming assessment cycle, Assessor LeGrett reported at the township's January 8 monthly meeting. The increase, which will...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Advances Infrastructure Projects Despite Winter Conditions

Jackson Township continues progress on major infrastructure improvements while maintaining winter road operations, officials reported at the January 8 township meeting. Supervisor Matt Robbins updated the board on the ongoing...
Jackson Township

Jackson Township Meeting Briefs

Meeting Approvals: Jackson Township trustees unanimously approved December 2024 meeting minutes and the monthly financial statement during their January 8 meeting. The board also approved the assessor's 2025 budget as...
Police blue and red flashing light on the car in the street

Manhattan Police Reports

Disclaimer: Charges against each defendant are merely an accusation, with all defendants presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. On November 25, officers cited Parker, Kenneth R (53) of...
Blue flasher light of siren of police car

Manhattan Police Reports

Disclaimer: Charges against each defendant are merely an accusation, with all defendants presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. On November 17, officers cited Randle, Devante (24) of...