U.S. House OKs Fetterman bill allowing SNAP to cover hot rotisserie chicken
A bill that would allow recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to buy hot rotisserie chicken is one step closer to becoming law.
On Thursday, the state House voted 384-35 in support of an amendment to the Farm Bill, which would modify the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 law to allow the purchase of hot rotisserie chicken for SNAP beneficiaries.
U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., introduced bipartisan legislation labeled the “Hot Rotisserie Chicken Act,” in the Senate a week ago to change the current statute, which allows SNAP recipients to purchase cooked rotisserie chickens that have been cooled down, but it does not allow the purchase of hot prepared foods.
He took to social media on Thursday evening to celebrate its passage in the U.S. House.
“Doesn’t only include my crew’s favorite + affordable $4.99 Costco rotisserie — but ANY hot rotisserie,” he said in part of social media post. “Feeding families: a (rotisserie) chicken in every pot.”
SNAP to include HOT ROTISSERIE CHICKEN.384-35! Doesn’t only include my crew’s favorite + affordable $4.99 Costco rotisserie 😜 — but ANY hot rotisserie.Feeding families: a (rotisserie) chicken in every pot. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/N9bNfynRKx— U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) April 30, 2026
Since the 1970s, when most Americans prepared meals from scratch, the hot foods ban has been in place for SNAP. 30% of SNAP recipients cite lack of time as a barrier to cooking, while 15% cite physical disability and 11% cite lack of kitchen equipment, according to a 2021 USDA report.
About 12.3% of U.S. residents receive SNAP benefits, federal data shows. Two million in Pennsylvania, or roughly 15% of the population, use the program, spending more than $350 million monthly across 38,000 stores, some of which depend mostly on these sales to survive.
Fetterman and U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo. were joined by West Virginia GOP U.S. Sens. Jim Justice and Shelley Moore Capito in this effort.
Capito called the bill a “simple, practical step to make the program work better for the people it serves.”
“SNAP funds would be well spent to feed our nation’s families who need it,” Fetterman said about the proposal.
Supporters of the proposal argue that rotisserie chickens, priced around $5 a piece at grocery stores, are “unmatched in value, especially when factoring in how much time it saves.”
The bipartisan proposal from Fetterman does not increase funding or participant eligibility for SNAP or include all other hot food. It also only applies to eligible retailers, maintaining that SNAP will not be expanded to restaurants.
About 70% of SNAP participants are children, elderly, or have disabilities, according to the National Association of Convenience Stores.
Fetterman, a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, has also backed other efforts addressing SNAP benefits including Bennet’s Hot Food Act, which would allow all hot foods to be eligible under the program, and the Cybersecurity for SNAP Act, which would increase the security of EBT cards to prevent skimming.
The measure now heads to the Senate for consideration as part of the farm bill, according to The Hill.
Latest News Stories
Access Will County Dial-A-Ride Reports Massive Growth After Consolidating Paratransit Services
Trade, Taiwan top priorities for Trump, Xi as two leaders wrap first meeting
Critics question unions after $1B in political spending
Trade court to rule on tariff stay by next week
Johnson defends Trump ballroom as ‘a donation to the country’
Vance cuts $1.3 billion in California Medicaid, pauses hospice care
Groups urge House leaders to reject E15 expansion, calling it a hidden tax
Lincoln-Way West Edges Bradley-Bourbonnais in 5-4 Conference Thriller
Illinois Quick Hits: Home insurance regulations approved by Illinois Senate
Senate confirms Warsh on narrow partisan lines
Illinois Senate passes bill to regulate auto insurance rates
Exclusive: GOP defends report, points to Walz administration failures on fraud
Op-Ed: The FAA’s O’Hare decision is a win for travelers – and for competition
Bill to prevent fraud on elderly, disabled opposed by financial institutions