Johnson defends Trump ballroom as ‘a donation to the country’
Despite public condemnation from Democrats, House Republicans are confident that the $1 billion earmark for security upgrades to President Donald Trump’s ballroom will remain in their budget reconciliation bill.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters Wednesday that congressional Republicans are “right on schedule” to pass the filibuster-proof bill – which also appropriates $70 billion in advance funding for federal immigration enforcement agencies – by June 1.
“We will fully fund both border security and immigration enforcement for the balance of President Trump’s term,” Johnson said. “Democrats are chomping at the bit to regain power and reopen our borders and allow violent criminal illegal aliens to continue to roam our streets… and we’re not going to let them do that. So we’re eager to quickly finish this reconciliation process and get this bill to the president’s desk.”
Democrats have accused Republicans of being “out of touch” for providing an extra $1 billion to the Secret Service, a sum that would ultimately pay for security upgrades in the White House ballroom, currently under construction.
“There’s a theme here: Republicans are ready to spend, spend, spend — just not on anything that makes life more affordable,” House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., said in Wednesday news conference. “Republicans are turning their backs on the people they represent.”
Johnson, however, said Democrats’ comments were “a gross misstatement of what’s going on here in the bill.”
He argued that the recent shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, which took place in a ballroom of the Washington, D.C. Hilton hotel, proves the need for security at the White House venue.
“The Secret Service put in an urgent request for additional security measures. It’s not for the ballroom – it’s for security measures,” Johnson said. “And we’ve needed some of these security measures for a long time. And that’s what this is all about, so there’s a false narrative out there about it.”
The budget reconciliation bill specifies that “[n]one of the funds made available… may be used for non-security elements” of the project, referring to the construction of the ballroom itself.
“[I]t should be something that’s bipartisan. The ballroom is totally privately funded – the president has dedicated like $400 million for that project,” Johnson added. “And by the way, it’s going to be a donation to the country. You’re aware the ballroom will be there long after he leaves, and he’ll only get a few months of its use, so he’s doing it for the country.”
Though Johnson projected optimism that the $1 billion earmark would remain in the bill, it could still get stripped if the Senate parliamentarian finds it violates the Byrd Rule.
Some vulnerable Republican lawmakers have also expressed hesitancy to approve a controversial provision that Democrats say they fully intend to capitalize on as the midterm elections approach.
Latest News Stories
Will County to Draft First-Ever Policy on Artificial Intelligence Use
Will County Sees 50% Drop in Opioid Deaths, But Alarming Rise in Suicides
Will County Board Backs Effort to Rename ‘Stigmatizing’ Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal
Access Will County Dial-a-Ride on Track for Full County-Wide Service in 2026
Divided Will County Board Authorizes Condemnation for 143rd Street Widening
Will County Committee Approves Preliminary $161.6M Tax Levy on Split Vote Amid Heated Debate Over Spending
Will County Eyes Major Overhaul to Consolidate Scattered Government Offices
Sheriff’s Office Reports Crime Down 10%, Cites Body Cam Footage as Main Challenge of Safety Act
Will County Considers Moving Land Use Public Hearings Away from Full Board Meetings
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Jackson Township Board for August 13, 2025
Jackson Township to Investigate Decade-Old High-Speed Rail Plan Through Elwood
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Manhattan Park Board for August 14, 2025
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for September 18, 2025
Jackson Township Approves Settlement with Joliet, Union Pacific Over ICC Case