Hundreds of Uber drivers demand union-permitting bill move in Springfield
(The Center Square) – Nearly 400 drivers for platforms like Uber and Lyft appeared at the Illinois Capitol, where they urged lawmakers to move forward with Senate Bill 2906, which would give collective bargaining rights to many of the independent contractor drivers.
Aside from the unionization, the current Senate version would also impose a new fee of 4 cents per trip, which would go to a Rideshare Workers Support Fund, and could be increased based on the Consumer Price Index each calendar year.
Sponsor of the bill, state Sen. Ram Villivalam, D-Chicago, characterized the bill as one that would result in better working conditions, wages and increased job benefits.
“We would like the corporations that are making, I think, $43 billion dollars in profit to do the right thing. But because they won’t on their own, we’re going to make them,” Villivalam said.
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, however, has pushed back. In March, Director Kimberly Stevens told a House committee that their chamber’s version of the bill presents a conflict of interest in the per-ride fee.
Stevens said the conflict is that the board would be managing funds for unions it also regulate.
She told lawmakers her agency doesn’t collect fees and would not be able to provide information or data about employers to the union, as it isn’t within their purview.
The amended Senate version attempts to correct the conflict by allowing the board to contract a third-party organization for the services.
Sen. Robert Peters, D-Chicago, spoke of affordability in the state, and issues drivers face, including sometimes suspending driver accounts over unfounded claims.
“It is our time and our moment to get what we need. So, we’re going to get a union in the state and we won’t take no for an answer,” Peters said.
Ronnie Gonzalez, a representative with the International Association of Machinists Union, explained why the group feels it needs the ability to bargain with the companies, even though they are not traditional employees.
“While these advancements and technologies have been enjoyed by the passengers, the workers are left behind by federal and state labor laws that do not recognize their changing in work environment,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez previously told The Center Square that stakeholders concerned with the per-ride fee over cost to riders are unfounded, and if they required the companies to instead pay into the fund, there would be less transparency for consumers.
The bill has been continuously postponed in the Labor Committee since mid-April, with no hearing scheduled.
Latest News Stories
As summer ends, budget battles and investigations await
Tensions Flare as JJC Chairman Rebukes “Entitlement” After Trustee Lists Demands
Trump’s tariff revenue in doubt after appeals court ruling
Congress to face mounting pressure to act on future of D.C.
Trump says appeals court ruling rejecting tariffs ‘highly partisan’
Manhattan-Elwood Library Raises Tax Levy Amid Growing Pains and Need for More Space
DOJ urges federal judge to strike down climate change law
WATCH: Newsom deploys state police to help local law enforcement
Appeals court rejects Trump’s tariffs, but leaves them in place
Denver Public Schools accused of violating Title IX
Poll: 41% of parents worried about school safety before Minneapolis shooting
Report: Offshore wind critics played role in Revolution Wind work stoppage