Hundreds of Uber drivers demand union-permitting bill move in Springfield
(The Center Square) – Nearly 400 drivers for platforms like Uber and Lyft appeared at the Illinois Capitol, where they urged lawmakers to move forward with Senate Bill 2906, which would give collective bargaining rights to many of the independent contractor drivers.
Aside from the unionization, the current Senate version would also impose a new fee of 4 cents per trip, which would go to a Rideshare Workers Support Fund, and could be increased based on the Consumer Price Index each calendar year.
Sponsor of the bill, state Sen. Ram Villivalam, D-Chicago, characterized the bill as one that would result in better working conditions, wages and increased job benefits.
“We would like the corporations that are making, I think, $43 billion dollars in profit to do the right thing. But because they won’t on their own, we’re going to make them,” Villivalam said.
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, however, has pushed back. In March, Director Kimberly Stevens told a House committee that their chamber’s version of the bill presents a conflict of interest in the per-ride fee.
Stevens said the conflict is that the board would be managing funds for unions it also regulate.
She told lawmakers her agency doesn’t collect fees and would not be able to provide information or data about employers to the union, as it isn’t within their purview.
The amended Senate version attempts to correct the conflict by allowing the board to contract a third-party organization for the services.
Sen. Robert Peters, D-Chicago, spoke of affordability in the state, and issues drivers face, including sometimes suspending driver accounts over unfounded claims.
“It is our time and our moment to get what we need. So, we’re going to get a union in the state and we won’t take no for an answer,” Peters said.
Ronnie Gonzalez, a representative with the International Association of Machinists Union, explained why the group feels it needs the ability to bargain with the companies, even though they are not traditional employees.
“While these advancements and technologies have been enjoyed by the passengers, the workers are left behind by federal and state labor laws that do not recognize their changing in work environment,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez previously told The Center Square that stakeholders concerned with the per-ride fee over cost to riders are unfounded, and if they required the companies to instead pay into the fund, there would be less transparency for consumers.
The bill has been continuously postponed in the Labor Committee since mid-April, with no hearing scheduled.
Latest News Stories
Exclusive: Poll says taxpayer funds shouldn’t go to public college athletic departments
Exclusive: Poll shows Americans opposed to legalized sports wagering
Illinois Quick Hits: Independents launch campaigns for governor, Congress
South Carolina off the redistricting bandwagon
Manhattan Board Weighs Expanding Attorney Access in Transparency Push
Meta to ask appeals court to end biometrics suit over Messenger filters
Paxton pushes Cornyn out of longtime U.S. Senate seat
Costco says no refunds owed to customers for tariff price hikes
Dems decide against joining fraud roundtable at White House
VA launches MDMA trial years in the making for veterans
AI safety regulations advance in Springfield, despite industry concern
EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Border Patrol chief retires after historic drop in illegal border crossings