Democrats dissatisfied by DOJ’s pause on ‘anti-weaponization fund’
The U.S. Department of Justice is temporarily backing down from its plan to launch a $1.77 billion “anti-weaponization fund” after a federal judge issued a short-term restraining order.
Congressional Democrats, however, vowed Monday to bring forward legislation permanently banning the fund, forcing Republicans to vote on an issue so politically toxic it derailed the advance of their $72 billion budget reconciliation bill in May.
“If [President Donald] Trump and Republicans are truly abandoning this corrupt scheme, they should have zero problem banning it in law,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., posted Monday afternoon on social media. “This week, Senate Democrats will push legislation to ban this slush fund and ensure no president can ever do this again. Trump’s word is nowhere near enough.”
In its statement Monday, the DOJ said it disagreed “strongly” with Virginia-based Judge Leonie Brinkema’s decision to block the creation of the fund until June 12.
The money – sourced from Trump’s settlement with the IRS after he sued the agency for the leakage of his 2019 and 2020 tax returns – would support people claiming that the former Biden administration unfairly targeted them for political or ideological reasons.
Rather than promising to drop the fund altogether, the DOJ simply stated it “will abide by the Court’s ruling,” which expires in less than two weeks.
“You don’t get credit for complying with a temporary court order,” Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., said in response to the DOJ’s announcement. “Trump’s scheme to rob American taxpayers won’t be dead until Congress bans it.”
Although Republicans’ political troubles will continue, the DOJ’s decision may sway enough Republican holdouts in the Senate to support the $72 billion bill funding immigration enforcement agencies.
The party-line bill, which funds ICE and U.S. Border Patrol for the next three years, needs only a majority vote to pass the Republican-controlled Senate.
It was set to do so until the DOJ unveiled the “anti-weaponization fund,” causing Republican senators to deadlock over whether they should attach restrictions on the controversial fund to the reconciliation bill.
Several Republican holdouts have expressed optimism over the DOJ’s Monday announcement, though none have publicly commented on how they will vote. Republican leadership is hoping to get the bill to Trump’s desk by Friday.
Latest News Stories
An ‘arms race’ for pay at elite, tax-exempt colleges
Inflation rises to 3.8%, driven by energy prices
New congressional map expected for Alabama in wake of high court ruling
Manhattan District 114 Explores Joint Community Survey for Fall Strategic Plan
State Legislative Update: Housing Mandates, Mega Projects, and Data Centers Prompt Local Control Concerns
Data center regs proposed as $20 billion, 795-acre Joliet project advances
Labor stats offer mixed bag for Illinois
Lawsuit: IL state VRA unconstitutionally lets Dems divide voters by race
Illinois Quick Hits: State grants offered to tackle ‘challenging’ properties
Officers mourn fallen Chicago cop as policy debate grows
Trump accuses Schumer of election ‘interference’ with New York task force
Poll site gun ban proposal draws pushback