High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

Spread the love

After a $3.5 billion contract was awarded for track and electrical work on California’s high-speed rail, critics are calling the entire project problematic because of a lack of transparency.

It’s the latest criticism of a delayed project that is costing taxpayers more than $100 billion in additional costs.

The firm Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog won the contract approved at Tuesday’s High-Speed Rail Authority meeting. That firm won out over one other bidder, which was ruled out because that firm didn’t meet all the requirements set out by the state agency.

No one from Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog responded to The Center Square’s request for comment on Friday.

According to a presentation from the meeting earlier this week, $118.1 million will pay for design, acquiring materials and doing pre-construction work, among other facets of the project. Roughly $260 million will pay for engineering work, laying track and construction – totaling about $378.9 million to start laying down tracks.

Other facets covered by the contract include an overhead contact system and traction power, train control and communications systems.

“The bottom line is, I think we should pull the plug on this whole thing,” state Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, told The Center Square on Friday afternoon. “The fact is that they’re moving forward without a realistic plan. Even the inspector general said the plan, moving forward, is unrealistic.”

Strickland said he is concerned the high-speed rail doesn’t have the money on hand to follow through on construction and be built the way it was proposed almost 20 years ago.

“They have major cash flow issues and major funding issues,” Strickland said. “The fact that they’re willing to move forward and waste billions of dollars on a project that I believe will never be built as proposed for the people of California, I think, is irresponsible.”

Some board members had concerns this week about designating so much money to paying for various phases of the continued construction of high-speed rail, especially with the $3.5 billion going to just one company. However, High-Speed Rail Authority staff said during the meeting that walking away from working with a contractor was “not desirable.”

“We’re invested and our partners are invested in getting this project right,” Ed Fenn, chief of construction at the High-Speed Rail Authority, said during the meeting. “We have a lot of institutional knowledge as far as what costs and schedules should be, and we have experts to help us ensure that we have competitive pricing going forward.”

An official from The High-Speed Rail Authority said on Friday via email that while the 119-mile segment that runs through the Central Valley will be electrified and ready to test after work is complete, it will start operations at a later date.

“It will not be operational yet,” Micah Flores, public relations manager for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, told The Center Square. “Certification, train-set testing and other pre‑revenue activities still need to occur. This segment is part of the 171-mile operating line between Merced and Bakersfield, which is planned to begin passenger service in 2033.”

So far, the high-speed rail project is estimated to cost $126.2 billion, much more than the $9.95 billion bond that California voters approved in 2008, according to previous reporting by The Center Square. The complete high-speed rail was supposed to be finished in 2020.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Will County Board Graphic.04

Board Approves Joliet Township Clean Fill Facility Despite Environmental Objections

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board approved a map amendment and special use permit for a Clean Construction and Demolition Debris (CCDD) facility...
solar panels photovoltaics in solar farm

Will County Board Unanimously Rejects Controversial Solar Farm in Troy Township

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board unanimously rejected a special use permit for a commercial solar energy facility near Shorewood following strong opposition...
Will County Board Graphic.03

Committee Approves $740,000 Compressor to Boost RNG Plant Uptime

Will County Landfill Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Article Summary: The Landfill Committee approved the purchase of a fourth feed compressor for the Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) facility to...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Lincoln-Way District 210 Board of Education for February 19, 2026

Lincoln-Way District 210 Board of Education Meeting | February 19, 2026 NEW LENOX – The Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 Board of Education met on Thursday, February 19, 2026, to...
Will County Board Graphic.04

County Approves $1.9 Million for Wilmington-Peotone Road Engineering

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board authorized nearly $2 million in Motor Fuel Tax funds to begin Phase I design engineering for improvements...
Police Crime

County Board Authorizes Audit of Homer Glen Policing Contract; Officials Seek ‘True Cost’ of Services

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board unanimously approved a $75,000 contract to audit the cost of law enforcement services provided to the Village...
solar panels photovoltaics in solar farm

Soltage Drops Battery Storage Plans, Secures Extensions for Two Crete Solar Projects

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board granted second extensions to special use permits for two solar energy projects in Crete Township. The developer,...
Will County Board Graphic.02

Scrap Metal Drop-Off Near Mokena Approved by Single Vote

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: A contested proposal for an outdoor recyclable material drop-off facility in Frankfort Township passed by a single vote following objections from...
Will County Board Graphic.01

Landscape Business Approved on Cedar Road Despite ‘Dangerous Curve’ Concerns

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board approved a special use permit for a landscape business on Cedar Road in Homer Glen, despite concerns...
Committee-Ad-Hoc.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee for February 10, 2026

Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, to continue its comprehensive...
Committee-Land Use.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Land Use & Development Committee for February 5, 2026

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | February 5, 2026 The Will County Land Use and Development Committee met on Thursday, February 5, 2026, to deliberate on several...
Screenshot 2026-03-22 at 12.12.19 PM

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Manhattan School District 114 for February 11, 2026

Manhattan School District 114 Meeting | February 11, 2026 The Manhattan School District 114 Board of Education held its regular meeting on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. at...
Screenshot 2026-02-22 at 5.06.42 PM

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees for February 18, 2026

Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees Meeting | February 18, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees met on Wednesday, February 18, 2026, for a regular meeting dominated...
Committee-Executive.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Executive Committee for February 11, 2026

Will County Executive Committee Meeting | February 11, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Executive Committee met on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, tackling a heavy agenda focused on economic development...
Screenshot 2026-02-22 at 4.29.56 PM

Advisory Committee Debates Rigor of Online Summer School Options

Lincoln-Way District 210 Board of Education Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The District 210 Advisory Committee reported on discussions regarding the potential expansion of online summer school offerings,...