Chicago council committee rejects mayor’s proposed tax hikes
(The Center Square) – The Chicago City Council Committee on Finance has rejected a package of higher taxes proposed by Mayor Brandon Johnson.
After the committee voted 25 to 10 against Johnson’s revenue package Monday afternoon, the mayor refused to back down from his proposed corporate head tax.
The mayor’s plan would impose a $21-per-worker monthly tax on businesses with 100 employees or more, although there have been discussions about some workers being exempted. A business with exactly 100 employees would pay $2,100 a month, or $25,200 annually.
Johnson said Chicago’s elevated number of downtown office vacancies are not a result of high taxes.
“The reason why, first of all, the vacancy exists is because, obviously, we’re still recovering from the pandemic. There is no correlation between taxation and the success, if you will, of corporations,” Johnson said.
Reed Smith partner David Dorner said a head tax is not the way to bring people into Chicago.
“I think it’s going to keep people out of the city when we want to bring them back in and have people working here, coming downtown, visiting the downtown businesses. You don’t want to give them a reason not to come to the office, and that’s what the head tax would do,” Dorner told The Center Square.
In addition to the corporate head tax, the mayor’s $16.6 billion spending plan includes new taxes on social media, sports betting and boat mooring.
Dorner said the mayor’s cloud tax, or lease tax, would affect the lease, rental or use of computer software or cloud infrastructure.
“As you can imagine, businesses today spend a lot of their budget on technology, including software as a service, and that’s going to be subject to this higher tax if it’s passed by the city of Chicago. It’s already at 11%. It wasn’t too long ago it was at 9%,” Dorner explained.
Dorner said increasing the tax to 15% would impact businesses and individuals who pay for software licenses.
The mayor was asked about opposition to the cloud tax from small business owners and aldermen.
“First of all, it doesn’t affect working people the way in which it’s being described. We’re talking about an industry that’s making more money than they even imagine,” Johnson said.
Johnson insisted that a corporate tax would stay in his budget and promised to veto any budget with a property tax increase. He also promised to veto any budget that included layoffs.
The city council’s budget committee cancelled its scheduled meeting Monday afternoon after the finance committee defeated Johnson’s tax package.
As of late Monday afternoon, the full council was still scheduled to meet Tuesday morning.
Latest News Stories
Manhattan Fire District Earns Clean Audit, Hires Investment Manager
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Manhattan Village Board for October 21, 2025
Will County Health Department Pleads for $1 Million to Avert ‘Weakened Public Health System’
Frankfort Township Board Objects, but County Commission Recommends Bar with Video Gaming
Manhattan Village Board Approves Water and Sewer Rate Hikes to Fund Future Infrastructure
Safety Upgrades Coming to Dangerous Route 50 and County Line Road Intersection
Manhattan Bans Retail Sale of Kratom, Citing Public Health and Addiction Risks
Will County Committee Grapples with $8.9 Million Budget Gap After Contentious 0% Tax Levy Vote
New Lenox Solar Farm Proposal Advances with Conditions, Following Village and Forest Preserve Input
Manhattan Fire District Approves $8.75 Million Bond Sale for New Fire Station
Manhattan Approves Annexation for 41-Home Butternut Ridge South Subdivision
Manhattan Residents Voice Fears Over Traffic Safety, Water Use Amid Regional Growth