Op-Ed: Illinois just cemented its place as a ‘Legislative Inferno’
Illinois already has a reputation for having one of the most hostile civil legal climates in America. On August 15, 2025, Governor JB Pritzker signed Senate Bill 328 into law and, with a single signature, took our business climate from bad to worse. The American Tort Reform Association’s recent Legislative HeatCheck Report had already warned of the dangers if this bill became law. Now that it has, we can expect those warnings to become reality, cementing Illinois as a “Lawsuit Inferno” for years to come.
This isn’t hyperbole. Senate Bill 328 fundamentally changes the civil legal standard so that out-of-state plaintiffs can sue out-of-state businesses for out-of-state disputes in Illinois courts, simply because some of the defendants’ business operations are located in the state. In plain English: our courts are now a magnet for lawsuits from across the country, even when the parties and the inciting event have nothing to do with this state.
For small business owners like me, this is a slap in the face. My company, Atlas Tool Works in Lyons, employs skilled Illinois workers, pays Illinois taxes, and invests in Illinois communities. Instead of making it easier to grow and create jobs, Springfield just made it easier for trial lawyers to cash in at the expense of our job creators.
Let’s be clear about what’s driving this. Since Election Day 2022, the trial bar has poured over $1 million exclusively into Democratic candidates and committees. According to the report, 81% of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association PAC’s contributions went directly to legislative candidates or PACs tied to the General Assembly and Senate. These are strategic investments aimed at expanding liability and creating new avenues to sue, lining lawyers’ pockets while Illinois companies foot the bill.
The consequences will be far-reaching. This law sends an unmistakable message to employers across the Prairie State: Illinois is closed for business. Why expand or relocate here if you can be dragged into our courts for something that didn’t even happen here? We’re already struggling with out-migration and lagging investment, and SB 328 works to pour gasoline on that fire.
Illinois families are already paying for our lawsuit-friendly civil justice system. We rank eighth highest in the nation for “tort tax” – the hidden cost of excessive litigation – adding more than $7,600 to every family’s budget each year. Now, with SB 328, those burdens will only grow, siphoning even more money for basic household necessities and funneling it into legal fees and egregious settlements.
But this doesn’t have to be the status quo. Illinois should be focusing on attracting investment instead of lawsuits. We can build a legal climate that is fair, balanced, and competitive. But that will require political will.
The call to action is simple and urgent: In the 2026 legislative session, lawmakers must roll back SB 328. Whether our legislators repeal it outright or, at a minimum, restore common sense guardrails, change is needed immediately. Anything less leaves Illinois on the wrong side of competition and common sense.
For the sake of Illinois’ economic future, we need leaders willing to stand up to special interests and undo this damage in 2026. Until then, business owners like me will keep asking the same question: how much longer can we afford to stay in Illinois?
Latest News Stories
L.A. congresswoman insists on health insurance tax credits
Newsom threatens university funding over Trump’s education deal
Former Los Angeles schools chief runs against city’s mayor
Illinois quick hits: WARN report layoffs total 1,689; Powerball winners in Rochelle and Colona
No ethics reform in sight as ex-speaker’s scheduled prison term begins
Trump losing ground on economy, poll finds
Major tech company to cut H-1B visas amid Trump pressure, fee
US, India to hold new round of trade talks, with focus on energy
Johnson: Republicans ‘have plans’ to ‘fix’ Obamacare
Illinois House Speaker: ‘Mr. Trump, tear down this fence!’
Energy cost concerns loom as legislators look at policy changes
PJM exit: A price solution or power move?