Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to Illinois public transport gun ban
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to decide whether individuals can carry firearms on public transportation.
The court declined to take up Schoenthal v. Raoul, which challenges an Illinois law banning citizens from carrying firearms on public transportation. Three Illinois residents challenged the ban, arguing it violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
“There is no historical tradition of banning law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms in crowded public locations where they may be more vulnerable,” lawyers wrote in a petition to the court.
Illinois requires gun owners to acquire a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card and a concealed carry license in order to carry a firearm in public. However, the state bans individuals from carrying a loaded or unsecured firearm onto buses, trains or any other type of public transportation that is paid for in part or whole by public funds.
Kwame Raoul, Illinois’ attorney general, argued the prohibition on guns in public transportation is consistent with the nation’s historical tradition limiting firearms in sensitive places, like court rooms, schools and polling places.
“Like historical sensitive places, public transit features ‘confined areas with a high density of people,’ making firearms ‘exceptionally dangerous,’” Raoul wrote.
Latest News Stories
Arizona GOP considers suing to redraw congressional map
Arizona GOP considers suing to redraw congressional map
Illinois Quick Hits: Congressman’s aide indicted on fraud allegations
JJC Board Meeting Halted by Lack of Quorum; New Student Trustee Sworn In
Jackson Township Outlines Spring Community Outreach, Prepares for Route 66 Centennial
Johnson, municipal leaders statewide clash with Pritzker over local funding cuts
Johnson, municipal leaders statewide clash with Pritzker over local funding cuts
Pettit’s Home Run, Late Rally Propel Lincoln-Way West Baseball Past Andrew 5-2
Illinois bill would force employers to pay employees regular wages for jury duty
Foxx: Prosecutors’ ‘silence’ on murder exonerations doesn’t mean ‘innocent’
Foxx: Prosecutors’ ‘silence’ on murder exonerations doesn’t mean ‘innocent’
Foxx: Prosecutors’ ‘silence’ on murder exonerations doesn’t mean ‘innocent’